Discussion:
Python 3
Johan Jonkers
2015-06-01 12:57:15 UTC
Permalink
Hello everyone,

I was wondering if there are plans to support python 3 for PyLucene. I
know there is an experimental Python 3 version of JCC but it is from
2010 I think, so a bit outdated. We would like to migrate from python
2.7 to 3.0 but we need PyLucene to work for that. Any information on
this matter, like perhaps a roadmap?, would be appreciated.

Regards,

Johan
Andi Vajda
2015-06-01 16:55:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Johan Jonkers
Hello everyone,
I was wondering if there are plans to support python 3 for PyLucene. I know
there is an experimental Python 3 version of JCC but it is from 2010 I think,
so a bit outdated. We would like to migrate from python 2.7 to 3.0 but we
need PyLucene to work for that. Any information on this matter, like perhaps
a roadmap?, would be appreciated.
Two things need to happen:
- the python 3 port of JCC needs to be revived (patches are welcome)
- the Lucene team needs to vote on releases for another release of
PyLucene to actually happen.

I prepared a PyLucene release candaidate for version 4.10.4 on March 10th
and called for a release vote then.

Only one PyLucene user responded and _no_ Lucene PMC members (besides
myself) voted on it. Without votes, no PyLucene releases can happen.

As it is, the project is dormant for lack of interest.

Andi..
Post by Johan Jonkers
Regards,
Johan
Petrus Hyvönen
2015-06-23 07:02:43 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

Just a heads-up, I'm not a PyLucene user but a frequent user of JCC in
another context wrapping scientific libraries in java. I would appreciate a
Python 3 compatible JCC in the future, most libraries are now Python 3
compatible and I think in the future this will be the python standard for
scientific computing. Of my stack that I use today I think JCC is the only
library requiring python 2.

My programming skills are limited, but can provide debugging support :)

Regards
/Petrus
Post by Johan Jonkers
Hello everyone,
Post by Johan Jonkers
I was wondering if there are plans to support python 3 for PyLucene. I
know there is an experimental Python 3 version of JCC but it is from 2010 I
think, so a bit outdated. We would like to migrate from python 2.7 to 3.0
but we need PyLucene to work for that. Any information on this matter, like
perhaps a roadmap?, would be appreciated.
- the python 3 port of JCC needs to be revived (patches are welcome)
- the Lucene team needs to vote on releases for another release of
PyLucene to actually happen.
I prepared a PyLucene release candaidate for version 4.10.4 on March 10th
and called for a release vote then.
Only one PyLucene user responded and _no_ Lucene PMC members (besides
myself) voted on it. Without votes, no PyLucene releases can happen.
As it is, the project is dormant for lack of interest.
Andi..
Post by Johan Jonkers
Regards,
Johan
--
_____________________________________________
Petrus Hyvönen, Uppsala, Sweden
Mobile Phone/SMS:+46 73 803 19 00
Andi Vajda
2015-06-26 12:04:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Petrus Hyvönen
Hi,
Just a heads-up, I'm not a PyLucene user but a frequent user of JCC in
another context wrapping scientific libraries in java. I would appreciate a
Python 3 compatible JCC in the future, most libraries are now Python 3
compatible and I think in the future this will be the python standard for
scientific computing. Of my stack that I use today I think JCC is the only
library requiring python 2.
Agreed, it would be nice to revive that jcc branch and make it current. Patches are welcome !

Andi..
Post by Petrus Hyvönen
My programming skills are limited, but can provide debugging support :)
Regards
/Petrus
Post by Johan Jonkers
Hello everyone,
Post by Johan Jonkers
I was wondering if there are plans to support python 3 for PyLucene. I
know there is an experimental Python 3 version of JCC but it is from 2010 I
think, so a bit outdated. We would like to migrate from python 2.7 to 3.0
but we need PyLucene to work for that. Any information on this matter, like
perhaps a roadmap?, would be appreciated.
- the python 3 port of JCC needs to be revived (patches are welcome)
- the Lucene team needs to vote on releases for another release of
PyLucene to actually happen.
I prepared a PyLucene release candaidate for version 4.10.4 on March 10th
and called for a release vote then.
Only one PyLucene user responded and _no_ Lucene PMC members (besides
myself) voted on it. Without votes, no PyLucene releases can happen.
As it is, the project is dormant for lack of interest.
Andi..
Post by Johan Jonkers
Regards,
Johan
--
_____________________________________________
Petrus Hyvönen, Uppsala, Sweden
Mobile Phone/SMS:+46 73 803 19 00
Loading...